🔗 Share this article

Avril Coleridge-Taylor continually experienced the burden of her parent’s heritage. As the daughter of the renowned Samuel Coleridge-Taylor, one of the prominent UK musicians of the turn of the 20th century, the composer’s name was cloaked in the lingering obscurity of history.

A World Premiere

In recent months, I contemplated these memories as I got ready to record the first-ever recording of her 1936 piano concerto. With its emotional harmonies, heartfelt tunes, and bold rhythms, her composition will offer music lovers deep understanding into how she – a wartime composer originating from the early 1900s – imagined her existence as a female composer of color.

Legacy and Reality

But here’s the thing about the past. It requires time to acclimate, to recognize outlines as they truly exist, to tell reality from misrepresentation, and I felt hesitant to face Avril’s past for some time.

I deeply hoped her to be a reflection of her father. To some extent, she was. The idyllic English tones of her father’s impact can be heard in many of her works, including From the Hills (1934) and Sussex Landscape (1940). However, one need only look at the names of her family’s music to realize how he viewed himself as both a standard-bearer of English Romanticism as well as a voice of the African diaspora.

It was here that Samuel and Avril began to differ.

American society evaluated Samuel by the brilliance of his music as opposed to the colour of his skin.

Parental Heritage

While he was studying at the prestigious music college, Samuel – the offspring of a African father and a white English mother – started to lean into his heritage. When the Black American writer the renowned Dunbar came to London in the late 19th century, the aspiring artist actively pursued him. He set this literary work to music and the next year adapted his verses for an opera, Dream Lovers. Then came the choral piece that made him famous: Hiawatha’s Wedding Feast.

Drawing from the poet Longfellow’s The Song of Hiawatha, the piece was an global success, especially with African Americans who felt indirect honor as the majority judged Samuel by the quality of his music instead of the his race.

Principles and Actions

Fame did not reduce his activism. In 1900, he participated in the pioneering African conference in the UK where he encountered the prominent scholar this influential figure and saw a variety of discussions, such as the oppression of the Black community there. He was a campaigner until the end. He sustained relationships with pioneers of civil rights including the scholar and Booker T Washington, delivered his own speeches on ending discrimination, and even engaged in dialogue on matters of race with the American leader on a trip to the White House in 1904. In terms of his art, the scholar reflected, “he made his mark so high as a composer that it cannot soon be forgotten.” He passed away in that year, in his thirties. However, how would Samuel have reacted to his child’s choice to travel to South Africa in the that decade?

Controversy and Apartheid

“Daughter of Famous Composer expresses approval to S African Bias,” ran a headline in the African American magazine Jet magazine. Apartheid “struck me as the appropriate course”, Avril told Jet. When asked to explain, she qualified her remarks: she was not in favor with the system “as a concept” and it “could be left to work itself out, guided by good-intentioned people of diverse ethnicities”. Had Avril been more in tune to her father’s politics, or raised in segregated America, she might have thought twice about apartheid. But life had protected her.

Identity and Naivety

“I possess a British passport,” she said, “and the authorities did not inquire me about my race.” So, with her “fair” skin (as described), she moved alongside white society, lifted by their admiration for her deceased parent. She presented about her family’s work at the educational institution and conducted the broadcasting ensemble in the city, featuring the heroic third movement of her composition, named: “In remembrance of my Father.” While a confident pianist personally, she did not perform as the soloist in her piece. Instead, she invariably directed as the conductor; and so the apartheid orchestra followed her lead.

The composer aspired, according to her, she “may foster a shift”. Yet in the mid-1950s, the situation collapsed. Once officials discovered her mixed background, she could no longer stay the country. Her UK document offered no defense, the diplomatic official advised her to leave or risk imprisonment. She went back to the UK, deeply ashamed as the magnitude of her innocence dawned. “The lesson was a hard one,” she expressed. Compounding her humiliation was the printing that year of her controversial discussion, a year after her unceremonious exit from that nation.

A Familiar Story

While I reflected with these memories, I sensed a recurring theme. The story of identifying as British until it’s challenged – which recalls troops of color who defended the English throughout the second world war and made it through but were denied their due compensation. And the Windrush generation,